found in this critic of Christensen disruption by Gosset
also strateachery on what Christenesen got wrong https://stratechery.com/2013/clayton-christensen-got-wrong/
disruption works on cost-minded business but not on consumers that value “the ineffable”
ideas: Gosset make epistemic remarks, Christensen claims scientificity and uses a rigourous framework of “dimensionality reduction” of complexity (world to tech trajectories, 2-dimensional and value networks maybe 3-d.
Strateachery correctly point to rigorous counter-argument, C. theory works B2B not B2C.
Staying epistemic, we could say scientific in business can’t be like physics because of complexity, byt complexity is a weak definition of the business world where among the many loops of complexity we have a concience/explicitation (hermeneutic) loop whereas a theory like Disruption and innovator dilemma gets mainstream changes perception, postures and eventually negates itself. of averages and outliers, suprises, a biology-like dynamic of population for example. Of course, just intuition, better stay rigorous like C.